Determinants of Intention to use Google Lens

By Vinh The Nguyen

Abstract


The Covid-19 epidemic has had a tremendous impact on all sectors of life. Children have more time to explore their environment and ask difficult questions that cannot be addressed instantly by their parents or relatives while they are not in school. Google Lens might be regarded as a useful auxiliary tool in addressing this issue. This study looked at the effects of seven different factors on people's intentions to use Google Lens. The modified Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology model was used to assess user behavior in terms of performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions, hedonic motivation, utilitarian value, and perceived risk. Generalized structured component analysis was employed to evaluate the proposed study model. Using data of 395 participants who had kids at home due to social distancing, the study results showed that performance expectancy, utilitarian value, social influence had a statistically significant and positive impact on behavioral intention, perceived risk had a statistically significant and negative effect on behavioral intention. However, this study did not find significant relationships between the effort expectancy and the behavioral intention, nor between the hedonic motivation and the intention to use the Google Lens application. Due to the dissatisfaction with validity and consistency, the factor of facilitating conditions was not included in the analysis. The reasons for these non-significant correlations will be examined further in a large-scale user experience research

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49(2), 155-173.

Azuma, R., Baillot, Y., Behringer, R., Feiner, S., Julier, S., & MacIntyre, B. (2001). Recent advances in augmented reality. IEEE computer graphics and applications, 21(6), 34-47.

Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., & Griffin, M. (1994). Work and/or fun: measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. Journal of consumer research, 20(4), 644-656.

Bilyk, Z. I., Shapovalov, Y. B., Shapovalov, V., Megalinska, A., & Dołhańczuk-Śródka, A. (2020). Assessment of mobile phone applications feasibility on plant recognition: comparison with Google Lens AR-app. Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Augmented Reality in Education (AREdu 2020), Kryvyi Rih, Ukraine,

Chennapragada, A. (2019). Helpful new visual features in Search and Lens. Retrieved 5/7 from https://www.blog.google/products/search/helpful-new-visual-features-search-lens-io/

Devi, A. N., & Gaurav, G. (2018). Reviews on Augmented Reality: Google Lens. International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology, 58(2), 94-97.

Featherman, M. S., & Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Predicting e-services adoption: a perceived risk facets perspective. International journal of human-computer studies, 59(4), 451-474.

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1977). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research.

Fuchs, K. (2021). How are small businesses adapting to the new normal? Examining tourism development amid COVID-19 in Phuket. Current Issues in Tourism, 1-5.

Hwang, H., Cho, G., & Choo, H. (2021). Generalized Structured Component Analysis. http://sem-gesca.com/webgesca/

Hwang, H., & Takane, Y. (2014). Generalized structured component analysis: A component-based approach to structural equation modeling. CRC Press.

Jung, K., Nguyen, V. T., & Lee, J. (2021). BlocklyXR: An Interactive Extended Reality Toolkit for Digital Storytelling. Applied Sciences, 11(3), 1073.

Jung, K., Nguyen, V. T., Piscarac, D., & Yoo, S.-C. (2020). Meet the virtual jeju dol harubang—The mixed VR/Ar application for cultural immersion in Korea’s main heritage. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(6), 367.

Jung, K., Nguyen, V. T., Yoo, S.-C., Kim, S., Park, S., & Currie, M. (2020). PalmitoAR: The Last Battle of the US Civil War Reenacted Using Augmented Reality. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(2), 75.

Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications.

Kock, N., & Hadaya, P. (2018). Minimum sample size estimation in PLS‐SEM: The inverse square root and gamma‐exponential methods. Information Systems Journal, 28(1), 227-261.

Kumar, A., Srinivasan, K., Cheng, W.-H., & Zomaya, A. Y. (2020). Hybrid context enriched deep learning model for fine-grained sentiment analysis in textual and visual semiotic modality social data. Information Processing & Management, 57(1), 102141.

LLC, G. (2021). Search what you see. Retrieved 6/4 from https://lens.google/

Lucia, B., Vetter, M. A., & Moroz, O. (2021). The Rhetoric of Google Lens: A Postsymbolic Look at Locative Media. Rhetoric Review, 40(1), 75-89.

Nguyen, V. T., Jung, K., & Dang, T. (2019). Creating Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality development in classroom: Is it a hype? AIVR,

Nguyen, V. T., Jung, K., & Dang, T. (2020). BlocklyAR: A Visual Programming Interface for Creating Augmented Reality Experiences. Electronics, 9(8), 1205.

Nguyen, V. T., Jung, K., Yoo, S., Kim, S., Park, S., & Currie, M. (2019). Civil War battlefield experience: Historical event simulation using augmented reality technology. 2019 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Virtual Reality (AIVR),

Pacheco, J. A. (2020). The “new normal” in education. Prospects, 1-12.

Rebekah, J., Wise, D. J. W., Bhavani, D., Regina, P. A., & Muthukumaran, N. (2020). Dress code Surveillance Using Deep learning. 2020 International Conference on Electronics and Sustainable Communication Systems (ICESC),

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American psychologist, 55(1), 68.

Saprikis, V., Avlogiaris, G., & Katarachia, A. (2021). Determinants of the Intention to Adopt Mobile Augmented Reality Apps in Shopping Malls among University Students. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 16(3), 491-512.

Sergeeva, N. A., Zakharova, A. N., Rublyova, O. S., & Tyutyunnik, S. I. (2021). Features of using methods and means of the augmented reality technology when teaching a foreign language. Перспективы науки и образования(2), 472-486.

Shapovalov, V., Shapovalov, Y., Bilyk, Z., Megalinska, A., & Muzyka, I. (2019). The Google Lens analyzing quality: an analysis of the possibility to use in the educational process.

Shapovalov, Y. B., Bilyk, Z. I., Atamas, A. I., Shapovalov, V. B., & Uchitel, A. D. (2018). The Potential of Using Google Expeditions and Google Lens Tools under STEM-education in Ukraine. arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.06465.

Soper, D. (2021). Calculator: a-priori sample size for structural equation models. Retrieved 10/10 from https://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc/calculator.aspx?id=89

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 425-478.

Viswanadhuni, D., Dalmet, M. L., Raghavendra Kalose, M., Mukherjee, S., & Ravi Kiran, K. (2021). Domain Knowledge Embedding Based Multimodal Intent Analysis in Artificial Intelligence Camera. Computer Vision and Image Processing: 5th International Conference, CVIP 2020, Prayagraj, India, December 4-6, 2020, Revised Selected Papers, Part II 5,

VONGURAI, R. (2021). Factors Influencing Experiential Value Toward Using Cosmetic AR Try-on Feature in Thailand. Journal of Distribution Science, 19(1), 75-87.

Wu, J.-H., & Wang, S.-C. (2005). What drives mobile commerce?: An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 42(5), 719-729.






International Journal of Information Science and Technology (iJIST) – ISSN: 2550-5114